QUOTE(comatose @ Nov 7 2007, 02:42 AM)

sylar was mean. he twist and turn and his greed to have all the powers and his wittiness made his the best villian last season. but if to compare who is worse, in season one i do remember molly saying that she cant find one man and that man is worse than sylar. which turns out to be maury. so since maury is under adam, i think adam is by far worse than sylar. i think we will only be ble to find out in the next few episodes.
I voted for Sylar.
[OPINION_RANT]
Here's a thing though. I thought they over-hyped Maury a lot in season 1.
We have that amazing piece of scene in season 1. "He can see me." Which, I think it's safe to say that it led many to believe, referred to as the new big baddie in season 2.
In season 2, clearly, he isn't the big baddie. Adam is. And maybe...just MAYBE, Molly said "He's worse than the boogeyman" just because Maury can directly scare Molly to death without even having to be near her. Maybe this doesn't necessarily mean that Maury > Sylar in terms of overall nastiness or abilities.
So, to say that since Adam > Maury and Maury > Sylar, then Adam > Sylar is a bit simplifying things a lot, don't you think? (And "Heroes" is a complicated show)
This also goes the same for Adam's "regeneration" from the explosion. Now, yes...based on physics, if he's inside that tent and it explodes, his body should explode to pieces and his head should be severed from his body, but I've learned to know better. In shows like these, it's better to suspend disbelief until you are shown a scene confirming your hunches or you are thrown a line where we can directly infer "that doing so will kill me."
This leads me to believe that maybe, Adam had to go through the pain of getting exploded upon by the gunpowder, but since we did not see his head severed from his body, we can assume that he was just heavily damaged but his head and body remained intact, that's why he was able to regenerate. Claire was able to grow her toe back, so Adam may be able to grow back his lost limbs.
BUT in season 1, we saw that Claire was Sylared (5 years gone). Peter remained dead/unable to regenerate with a shard of glass stuck in his head. In the latest episode, Peter electrocuted Adam's hands and it did sustain damage, albeit for a brief time. You can infer from here that once Sylar slices off Adam's head open, the wounds won't regenerate IMMEDIATELY making him susceptible for death/defeat.
If we're going a bit further out there, I say if Sylar knows or deduces something like what happened to Peter in season 1 (remaining "dead" as long as there's a shard of glass stuck in the brain), there is a big chance he can kill Adam. And Sylar is intuitive and sick enough to find ways to kill/hurt/damage people.
This is, of course, assuming Adam's ONLY power is cell regeneration. If he has other abilities at his disposal, it may be a hard fight.
Another thing, I don't get the whole "Adam's power is just like Claire's but a lot more advanced making him immortal OMG!" speculation. The best speculation we could have is that his cell regeneration is faster than Claire's. Fast enough to prevent the body from aging making him immortal, but not immune to damage. Tim Kring has stated time and again that "it's all in the brain" and there has been no indication that spontaneous regeneration means that you are impervious to damage. It just means that you sustain damage, but you heal back.
2 cents. Thanks.
Anyway, for overall nastiness, Sylar takes the cake. Adam will kill 93% of the world's population because he thinks it's the right thing to do to punish the humankind. Sylar will kill you just because he wants to, or he wants your brain.
[/OPINION_RANT]